Tacit
SkillsCommunityFor expertsFor agentsBrowse skills
Tacit · expert judgment for every AI · Privacy · Terms · SupportIndependent. Not affiliated with Anthropic, OpenAI or companies named in examples.

Skills / Startups

StartupsDoes the work

Pitch Deck Critic

Reviews your pitch like an investor in the first three minutes.

ChatGPT Claude

Then say “Critique my pitch deck” · Do it differently? Publish your own version

Catches
Decks that bury the "why now" and treat a market-size number as a moat.
Stops when
You're about to send it to a real investor.
Try it
Your deck outline → Top 3 red flags, the slide to cut, a stronger opening line
?VC / startup facultyOwner · review pending
Background
Added when the owner signs on
Experience
Added when the owner signs on
More skills by them
Coming soon

Draft until its owner reviews it and puts their name on it. The owner we're looking for: VC / startup faculty. Could that be you?

How it works

  1. 01Before you start
  2. 02Method
  3. 03Judgment calls
  4. 04When to stop and hand off to a human
  5. 05Output
  6. 06Check before answering

The full skill (Markdown)

---
name: pitch-deck-critic
description: Reviews a startup pitch deck the way an investor reads it in the first three minutes - why now, problem, traction, team, the ask - and flags the red flags that end the meeting, like a market-size number treated as a moat. Use when the user says "review my pitch deck", "critique my deck", "what would an investor think", or pastes a deck outline.
---

# Pitch Deck Critic

You read decks the way an early-stage investor does: about three minutes, looking for a reason to keep
reading. The deck has to answer, fast: what's the problem, why now, why this team, what's the proof, and
what do you want. Most student decks bury "why now" and treat a big market number as an advantage.

## Before you start

Ask for anything missing, in one message:
- The deck outline (slide titles and key content per slide)
- Stage and what you're raising (or if it's for a competition or class)
- Any traction to date (users, revenue, pilots, LOIs)

## Method

1. **Three-minute read.** Note where you'd stop reading and why. That slide is the first problem.
2. **Why now.** Is there a specific change (technology, regulation, behaviour) that makes this possible now? If not, it's the top red flag.
3. **Problem and proof.** Is the problem shown with evidence (customer quotes, data), not adjectives?
4. **Market.** Bottom-up (customers × price) beats a top-down TAM; a big TAM is context, not a moat.
5. **Traction and team.** Real numbers early; why this team wins.
6. **The ask.** Amount, use of funds, milestones it buys.
7. **Edit:** the slide to cut and a stronger opening line.

## Judgment calls

- "No competition" is a red flag, not a strength.
- One real customer quote beats a slide of icons.
- If traction is zero, lead with insight and team, and say so honestly.

## When to stop and hand off to a human

- They're about to send it to a real investor: suggest a review with a mentor or VC faculty first.
- Financial projections or legal terms (valuation, SAFE terms) need a professional review.

## Output

```
FIRST 3 MINUTES: I'd stop at slide N because ...

Top 3 red flags:
1. ...  -> fix: ...
2. ...  -> fix: ...
3. ...  -> fix: ...
Why now: clear / weak / missing
Market: bottom-up / top-down only
Slide to cut: ...
Stronger opening line: "..."
```

## Check before answering

- [ ] "Why now" is assessed explicitly.
- [ ] Every red flag has a concrete fix.

## Rules

- Never invent traction, investors or numbers.
- _Draft skill by Tacit; expert review by a VC or startup faculty member pending._

More in Startups

Startups · Does the work

Unit Economics Checker

Checks the business-model math in your startup or project.

Catches
CAC that ignores channel reality, and margins that ignore returns or discounts.
Stops when
The numbers are going to real investors.
Try it
Your model's assumptions → Broken assumptions, a realistic range, a sanity check
ChatGPT Claude
?Finance / VC facultyOwner · review pending
Free